Two Housing Developments Proposed for North York Road
Applicants say new units, which sit adjacent to Woodwinds, will bring about better stormwater management.
Two new housing developments are planned for sections of North York Road in Hatboro not far from other areas that have sustained significant flooding in recent weeks.
If the Hatboro Borough Council permits 10 additional units at Wynfair Apartments, 350 N. York Road; and 12 townhouses at 400 N. York Road, officials told Hatboro Borough Council during Monday’s meeting, that the developments’ more advanced stormwater management systems would help improve flood conditions onsite and nearby as well.
The main address for the oft-flooded Woodwinds condominiums is next door at 410 N. York Road. Condos are situated adjacent to both properties. Woodwinds residents attended Monday's meeting to demand borough help following home losses sustained in two almost back-to-back storms and flooding.
No action was taken Monday on either of the applications. Borough Manager Steven Plaugher said the council would consider both at its Sept. 26 meeting.
In terms of the two-story, 1,200-square-foot apartments planned for Wynfair, engineer Nicholas Rose of ProTract Engineering said the units would be built three feet higher than the 100-year floodplain. In addition, Rose said underground detention basins throughout the parking lot would help to capture “everything south of there,” including water from the roof.
“We’re required to capture all the different storms and let them go at different rates and volumes,” Rose said, adding that water would be “collected, held back, let out through a much smaller pipe.”
Wynfair owner Peter Tiburzio Jr. said the existing three buildings, which were built on the 3.6-acre site in the 1960s, did not sustain any flood damage during either of the last storms. If approval is granted, Tiburzio said construction on the nearly $1 million addition would begin in spring 2012 and complete six months later.
Marc Jonas, an attorney representing the owner of the 2.16-acre tract at 400 N. York Road, said approval was previously granted for the development of 10 townhouses on the site. Borough Manager Steven Plaugher said the court-ordered settlement had been approved in May 2009. Because of the down economy, the project had been shelved for a time, Jonas said.
On Monday, with new owners at the helm of the parcel, which currently houses a run-down residence and several vehicles which appear to be inoperable, Jonas asked the council to consider an amended plan for a total of 12 homes. In addition to rehabilitating the site, Jonas said the plan strives to implement advanced stormwater management practices to “help a regional condition that’s not ours.”
Jonas said the homes, which would be priced in the high $200,000 range, would all have basements – an amenity that drew a flood of questions from the council.
“These are for sale units,” Jonas said. “People want to have basements when they buy units.”
Councilman Bill Tompkins noted concerns over unit No. 8, in particular, related to its proximity to the new floodplain line.
Rose, who also acted as engineer for this project, said the homes would be elevated. And, he said basins would be situated vertically, helping to prevent flooding.
“There’s no opening that would allow that water to get into the basements,” Rose said. “There wouldn’t be groundwater pushing water into the basements.”
Councilwoman Aleta Ostrander disagreed.
“I had two sump pumps going,” Ostrander said of recent storms. “I don’t live in a floodplain.”
Jonas suggested doing a deed restriction to make the basement in unit No. 8 be used only for mechanical and storage, meaning the future homeowner would not be permitted to finish the basement.
Terri
12:33 pm on Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Does Hatboro really need any more development? Why not keep it open space?
Scott Johnson
12:56 pm on Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Is this the property that Hatboro launched a lawsuit to prevent back in the day which was unfortunately was dismissed due to a filing mistake? Or is this another area?
Kathy Leaycraft
11:38 am on Wednesday, September 14, 2011
Oh, great. More new townhouses, when homes and townhouses are for sale everywehre. After the Borough Council approved the building of that monster condominium/retail building where the old Hatboro Horsham High School used to be, I have no faith in their judgement. It towers over our historical buildings and is an eyesore and a monument to greed. I'm also guessing that after 4 years it's still not fully occupied.
Bill Tompkins
10:48 pm on Wednesday, September 14, 2011
Kathy, I am on borough council. We don't get to decide whether we like it or if we think it is a good idea or appropriate for the time and location, we only get to review that it meets the requirements of the boroughs zoning and land development ordinances primarily regarding buffering, storm water management, density and the like. It is the property owner that gets to use his property as he ses fit as long as he can pass the reviews. Definately not always enjoyable to have to sit up there at times and see something that you personally don't like and would rather not see done, but have to approve it because the owner meets the requirements and if you don't, the courts will let him do it and the borough gets stuck with the legal fees.
Tea Kay
7:47 am on Thursday, September 15, 2011
Unfortunately Hatboro was never placed on the National Register of Historical Places. Why The Millbrook Society has not done anything about that beyond me. From what I have read and heard, the local governance is all about revenue, and new buildings bring revenue.
Ryan S
3:37 pm on Monday, March 5, 2012
So I'm guessing this went through?
Maureen
4:19 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Just reading about the new developments and how the builders promise to keep the water from adding to the flooding that occurs in our area. That was also the promise of the builder that build Cobblestone and if anyone has visited that area there is nothing but erosion and additional flooding along the creek from York Road to Hatboro pool. In addition, this area was also removed from the "Flood Plan". Where is the common sense???