patching...
Update: Want to get your Hatboro and Horsham news in your inbox every morning? Sign up for our free newsletter! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Should Hatboro Residents Foot Costs for Woodwinds Buyouts?

The Hatboro Borough Council is discussing who should cover the local 3 percent match should 12 Woodwinds condominiums receive buyouts from the federal government.

Hatboro elected officials are wrestling with how to cover roughly $80,000 in local costs in the event the federal government approves buyouts of a dozen flood-damaged units at the Woodwinds complex. 

The council led the charge to request that the Federal Emergency Management Agency buy out the flood-ravaged homes, demolish them and return the property to its natural state, but Council President John Zygmont said during a capital budget meeting Monday that elected officials have yet to discuss who would cover the required 3 percent match of the approximate $2 million project.

Zygmont suggested that since any federal monies would be paid in a lump sum to Hatboro that the borough use the estimated $160,000 per homeowner to leverage the remaining amount needed, either from the property owner or the homeowner’s association. 

“I don’t know that we put the rest of the residents on the hook for all of it,” Zygmont said. “I didn’t buy the house up there. Why, as a resident, should I be paying for it?”

Zygmont directed acting borough manager Fred Zollers to look into how neighboring municipalities handle the required 3 percent match when properties receive government buyouts.

Zollers said that from what he has learned to date, other towns have handled the local match in a “multitude” of ways, including paying the fees outright and having residents fund the entire amount.

Councilman Mark Sheedy said that expecting the Woodwinds homeowners to cover the estimated $78,000 cost might be asking too much.

“If I bought the house for $200,000 and they’re only going to give me $150,000 … I don’t think I have a nickel to give you,” Sheedy said.

But, Councilman Bill Tompkins said Woodwinds property owners would save the realtor’s commission, which he said ranges from 3 percent to 6 percent of a home’s selling price in the real estate market.

Should the council opt to use borough funds to cover some or all of the expense, Zygmont said it would come from the capital budget.

If FEMA opts to buy out the properties, Zollers said the Woodwinds homeowners would receive the amount their home was appraised for – “no negotiation.”

Besides the home’s cost, Zollers said the roughly $2 million price tag would cover legal and engineering fees, demolition expenses, as well as the costs associated with returning the property, which abuts Pennypack Creek, to its natural grassy state. The borough would then own the property and be responsible for its maintenance. 

Zollers said FEMA is still reviewing the application and he did not know when a decision would be made or when funding would be available. 

  • Should Hatboro taxpayers cover the 3 percent match for Woodwinds buyouts?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        3 (23%)
    • No
        10 (76%)
    Total votes: 13
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Condominiums, FEMA, Flood, Hatboro, Pennypack Creek, Woodwinds, government buyouts, and pema

jenortip

6:46 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

The Woodwinds home owners should be on the hook for the three percent. Not one penny of borough funds should be used for the balance of local costs. I like Bill Tomkins comment about the normal 6 percent realtor fees. Who is going to maintain the property after the buyout? If it is the borough, a fund should be set aside to offset some of the expences.

Reply

Roman Gabriel

11:49 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Gee, I wonder where do nothing, career Phila. politician Allyson Schwartz is on this issue? She is a lazy P-O-S who has never stood up for those of us on the suburban side of the 13th congressional district. FEMA is doing its job on the federal level and there must be some kind of additional emergency funding available. Allyson Schwartz, YOU SUCK.

Reply

Bob

11:46 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

The owners of the Woodwinds should have had flood insurance. If they didn't it's their bad investment

Reply

Leave a comment