patching...
Update: Want to get your Hatboro and Horsham news in your inbox every morning? Sign up for our free newsletter! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Hatboro Residents Band Together to Fight Wawa

The yet-to-be-incorporated Hatboro Residents' Association is meeting monthly and is in the process of registering as a nonprofit group.

 

It may have been jumpstarted by plans to build a second Wawa in Hatboro, but April Fox-Regan said it won’t end there.

Fox-Regan, who almost singlehandedly drummed up enough support for a yet-to-be-incorporated Hatboro Residents’ Association, has big plans for the nonprofit group she hopes to have registered within the coming months.

“We have everything in place for a good town except a residents’ association,” she said. “It’s like a missing piece.”

And, with the addition of that last piece of the puzzle, Fox-Regan said she hopes to “survive the turmoil around the Wawa situation” and continue to branch out to help her town with historic preservation efforts, town beautification, cultural and artistic events, quality of life concerns and more.

“We’re not here just about Wawa,” she said.

But, at the moment, the convenience store’s plans to buy a trio of historic properties – including the Old Mill Inn and the building currently housing Spa Escape - knock down all but the former grist mill and build a six-pump gas station on Horsham and York roads, is definitely at the forefront. During last week’s meeting for the fledgling Hatboro Residents’ Association, Fox-Regan said 65 people showed up and “everybody was enthusiastic and participatory.”

Together, she said the team of would-be association members have divvied the borough into 14 zones and plan to go door-to-door soliciting signatures for a petition opposing Wawa.

“You can sign it or not,” Fox-Regan said of the “old-school” way in which her group intends to collect signatures of borough residents of voting age. “So many people in the community are asking us to do something about Wawa.”

Fox-Regan said the group is also making a "friends of Hatboro" Wawa petition for non-residents to sign. 

"So many friends from Horsham and particularly Upper Moreland consider Hatboro to be their hometown too," she wrote in an e-mail to Patch. "No organized plan for those neighborhoods has yet been made, but suggestions and volunteers are welcome to contact Heather Hamilton, our email and map expert (or me)."

Since the mere mention of another Wawa in Hatboro first came to light last month, residents have been divided over whether a shot in the arm to the borough’s tax base would be worth the loss of 18th century buildings, increased traffic and the addition of a commercial business in a residential district.

In an unscientific poll on Patch, 74 percent of the more than 700 total votes indicated that respondents were in favor of a second Wawa, while 21 percent opposed it. 

Wawa representatives made a brief presentation to the borough council last month and plan to host an informal question and forum for residents on Feb. 28 at Pennypack Elementary School.

Far from a done deal, Wawa has yet to file a formal plan with Hatboro. If and when plans are filed, the developer would need to be granted a variance by the zoning hearing board in order to build a commercial business in a residential zone.

Wawa Regional Real Estate Manager Susan Bratton told Patch she did not have a timeframe for when the store might be built or opened.

“We wanted to introduce the concept,” Bratton said following last month’s council meeting. “We’re putting our toe in the water.”

But, before the convenience store giant can submerge its foot, Fox-Regan and her supporters intend to be there, petition in hand, to try to thwart the development.

While Fox-Regan had suggested previously that borough residents align forces to buy the Old Mill Inn and the adjacent property from TD Bank for the $899,999 combined asking price, she said she’s not so sure that could happen.

“I’m just one person. Our group is so young that it’s growing and changing every day,” Fox-Regan said of her idea, which initially grew from a January Patch article about the Greater Hatboro Chamber of Commerce canceling its First Friday events. “We’re taking it a day at a time.”

In the end, whether Wawa comes or goes, Fox-Regan, a third-generation Hatboro resident, said she wants to encourage as many people as possible to get involved.

“It’s about having people come together and have a voice,” she said. “The town belongs to the people who live there.”

Related Topics: Hatboro, Hatboro Residents' Association, Old Mill Inn, and Wawa

Dolores Forget

7:30 am on Monday, February 6, 2012

I wonder where the 700+ folks in favor of the Wawa live? Probably not in Hatboro, and most certainly not across from or abutting the proposed site. Sorry, but saving $250 a year on gas is not worth selling out those in community who own homes adjacent to the proposed site.

Reply

Tara

7:47 am on Monday, February 6, 2012

Wouldn't a WaWa at this location cause HUGE traffic issues? York Rd. is already congested with traffic most of the time.
As far as the historic building in the flood zone...if no one can afford to purchase it, and no one can afford to fix it and maintain it everytime it gets hit by flood water, and no one is willing to pay to have it moved to a location that doesn't flood (not sure if thats possible) does it really matter if it's historical? If left where it's at without maintenance & repairs it will just rot away anyway.

Reply
Comment_arrow

The High Rd

7:32 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Gee thanks for your enlightenment Tara. I didn't know that NO ONE could afford to purchase the properties, or afford to fix it, or afford to maintain it, or is willing to pay to have it moved. And I guess a movement of hundreds of residents or a competent historical society surely couldn't raise moneys to afford that either. Interesting. Who knew?

Comment_arrow

Tara

9:07 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

High Rd. My comment was "IF" no one can afford to purchase & fix. I did not state No one can or will. If someone can and or will I guess they need to step it up already. So sorry I did not realize if I didn't agree with YOU I was forbidden to post here or be persecuted. So glad to see this venue is for only one opinion. Good luck with your opinion and I hope you all show up at the meetings and convince the powers that be to force the owner to donate the property.

Comment_arrow

who dat

4:09 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Tara...same thing happened to me when I chimed in on a previous forum regarding this venue. It IS obviously only for one opinion. Dare not dissent.

Comment_arrow

The Voice

4:47 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Don’t let the anti mob bully you, in fact their quit amusing to spar with. Some would even like to erect a statue of the “Cucumber Lady”. This so called patron saint of Hatboro heroically alerted the town to the advancing British army. Just prior to the massacre (battle) of Crooked Billet. Another special interest group in town is NOT what we need.

Comment_arrow

Sid Frank

3:17 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012

People are passionate about this issue. Please, continue the honest and intelligent discourse and continue to get the facts. I am a member of the HRA and I dont want people to feel bullied because they have opposing viewpoints. That's not who we are!

Dolores Forget

8:03 am on Monday, February 6, 2012

Traffic is definitely a concern. Also, a resident's association has formed to address the historic preservation and other local quality of life issues. The buildings have been there roughly 300 years and the Mill has gone without maintenance for the past 4 or 5 years, I believe.

Reply

Eileen

8:07 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012

And...the Spa Escape building is in very good shape with a thriving business in it. The owner of the business has tried to buy the building but I don't think TD Bank is inerested unless they can unload the "old Mill Inn" too.

Reply

brownie baking nimby

8:20 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012

I am all for bringing new businesses to town. NIMBYs like Fox-Regan should concentrate on getting Obama reelected or bringimg more brownies to Occupy Philly.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary Cummings

8:53 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012

With all do respect, BBN, how would you like a Wawa directly next to your home? Open 24 hours with noise, lights and possibly crime at all hours of the night? There are residents in the newly formed Hatboro Residents' Association who are looking at this reality and are not pleased. It's not necessary to bash Ms. Fox-Regan. She is not the only one who opposes this new site. There are many of us who love Wawa but would like to see it elsewhere. Instead, we'd like to see the community invest in 3 thriving businesses on that corner. Since there is a cap on local tax (I believe it's $700 per year), three businesses would actually bring in more tax $ than one Wawa.

Comment_arrow

The High Rd

7:14 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Well it looks like another ill-mannered Community/history hater has shown us what Hatboro will look like in 10 years if they get their way...a town filled with selfish bigots who support corrupt politics and federal financial ruin.

Comment_arrow

BP

8:21 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

With more than 200 fans on the Hatboro Life FB page, Ms. Fox-Regan is hardly a lone voice in the cause to save these historic structures. I applaud her for being such an articulate, intelligent spokesperson-and for not having to debase herself with name-calling of others. I guess that's why she doesn't need to use a screen name when she leaves a comment...

Steven

9:16 am on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

I work in Hatboro and I'm looking forward to this WaWa.

Reply

BBH

4:28 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Are those residents of Hatboro in favor of Wawa free to join the Hatboro Resident Association??? Quality of life can be defined in more than one way.

Reply

Dolores Forget

4:47 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

BBH -- I believe the organization is open to all Hatboro residents. The meeting information is posted on the Hatboro Life Facebook page and also in the windows of many businesses in town. However, based on the way some folks are behaving on these boards, I feel compelled to add that members are expected to behave in a civil manner toward one another, regardless of their opinion on individual issues.

Reply

HatsToYou

4:59 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Preserving a town's history is very important. Hatboro's historical buildings unfortunately are not together, Borough Hall, Union Library, Churches, etc. Problems with preserving historical areas are simple: you need to buy it, repair it (big bucks) and maintain it. Large grants and helpful foundations are needed. This is a tough task.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tara

5:49 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Agreed and well stated, thank you HatsToYou

Keyser Soze

7:38 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Yes, let's turn away a business to save a building that is currently listing heavily towards toppling over while the rest of the York Road corridor turns into a ghost town.

Reply

Keyser Soze

7:51 pm on Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Let's "band together" and push the Old Mill Inn into the Pennypack.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dan Dee

8:29 am on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Keyser...are you nuts? The Hatboro I.R.A. will surely attack you for such comments. May god have mercy on your soul.

Comment_arrow

Keyser Soze

8:17 am on Thursday, February 9, 2012

Dan Dee, you are right, what was I thinking? I'll just have the wife start the car.

EE

3:08 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012

To everyone that writes a response,please get your faxs right.I have read many remarks how the Old Mill is falling in the creek or just plain falling apart.Mills are designed to be in a wet area with a high water table.Just because the stucco is cracking and a poorly built addition is falling down does not mean the building is going to fall over.The Old Mill is a solid structure.As far as the HRA goes they are not telling people what to do with their property they are tring to save a piece of Hatboro History.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Al Kaholik

9:13 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012

"HRA...not telling people what to do with their property....save piece of history"....Yup, by attempting to sabotage its sale so the owner continues to be stuck with them unless its sale and subsequent use appeases HRA and suits their vision of what Hatboro should be (a pipe dream of overpriced boutiques..in old, inefficient, costly buildings, apparently). Hatboro should be what survives on its own merit. Whether it's Cash for Gold, Roll Your Own, Aarons, Wawa, or anything else that the HRA doesn't like. A business survives because it has use and worth to its residents, not because it satisfies the vision of a few dreamers. I am off to Walmart for some odds and ends. I might stop at Wawa on my way home to get a hoagie to eat as I drink my six pack of Labatt before going to bed. I am more Hatboro than the HRA.

Sid Frank

3:12 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012

I think we call can agree that the Patch comments have become venting grounds for people and have unfortunately become breeding grounds for impolite and angered discourse. However, Al, I think what you're seeing is a definite passion that is not shared by just 65 people. There are petitions signatures coming in by the hundreds that are opposed to Wawa. I am a member of the Hatboro Residents' association and I am saddenned by the negativity that a few folks have been posting about this ambitious group. I'm also saddened by the members who feel they have to fight this dirty fight in these boards. They also do not represent the hard working, intelligent and kind people that are the HRA. They have made it clear that they want to connect with the residents and let their voices be heard. It is our experience that a large number of Hatboro Residents oppose not Wawa (we love the store), but its proposed location due to a long standing history of demolishing our town's history. However, it is understandable that not all Hatboro residents will agree on this issue, but the HRA was formed in earnest to prevent further demolition of historic places. So if you feel strongly enough about your viewpoint, make your voice heard. Perhaps the chamber of commerce supports the Wawa (I do not know) but organize yourself as well. I will warn you though....people can be nasty.

Reply

Cindy Blaser

9:22 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012

Make no mistake, this is about special interests, but thats the american way these days. Its private property and free citizens should have the right to build on it, as should others have the right to speak out. Maybe George Washington and Amelia E. visited these places, but for me BUILD, Baby BUILD. Good coffee, decent food, cheap gas and a good company is the way to go. Hatboro is not Doylestown, New Hope or Newtown. It is Hatboro - a nice town with nice people. Wawa doesn't change that. The town could use a litte change. In this econcomy folks should be glad a developer is interested; says something about the town. These buildings have lived out their useful lives; let them die in peace.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary Cummings

8:27 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012

This is a long term vs. short term investment here. Yes, a Taco bell would be great (love those), but if we invest in our historic area, in the long term we can grow our economy. Nobody wants to be Doylestown. I grew up there. I don't like what it's turned into (too uppity!). Hatboro needs to fill its business IN THE CENTER OF TOWN with things that are affordable, nice, and clean. In the meantime, lets focus on investing in the few historic buildings we have left. Believe it or not, it could help our property values in the long term. I don't think a Taco Bell (although delicious) can't do that!

Comment_arrow

little eileen

9:05 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Cindy, Hatboro isn't Doylestown....YET. If you stick the same chain stores in every town in Pennsylvania and simultaneously destroy the things that make Hatboro unique....The Old Mill Inn, for example...then eventually all you will have left is a bunch of towns that are all the same. What's the point in that? Free citizens should have the right to sell and build on their own property...yes...as long as it isn't infringing on anyone else's rights. And, at the point where you're destroying a landmark that Hatboro is recognized for and that many, many residents love, you are creating a situation where the public should be able to say no. Just like the town would have a right stop you from building an 'adult' drive-in theater in your backyard because most residents don't want it there. It saddens me to see so many of you willing to tear something down that is beautiful and irreplaceable. Wawa's are a dime a dozen, ugly, and according to Wawa's own spokesperson...probably not going to be a permanent fixture in town. Why destroy the Old Mill for that? If most residents don't want that, they should absolutely be allowed to stop it from happening. I just can't believe how little people value the things that make Hatboro, Hatboro.

Cindy Blaser

9:52 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012

Thanks who dat! Just found out about this board, seems like some good topics, although I disagree with some, its seems like a nice place to share ideas. I hope no one takes offense, but I just dont see the point with saving these places. The old restaurant looks a mess. I know it floods. I'd love to see it saved, but I don't think that will have. Its right on the creek! I know it will flood. Maybe we'll get some good food in town, like a KFC or Taco Bell. My daugheter loves Taco Bell!

Reply

Tara

10:48 pm on Thursday, February 9, 2012

I am not sure but I believe the Old Mill is NOT a registered historical building. To be listed as one doesn't the present owner have to start that ball rolling? If so I doubt TD is ging to do that. Does Zoning support a WaWa? Has zoning ever been changed or adjusted in Hatboro in the past for something like a WaWa? Can you imagine wanting to move yourself and your neighbors telling you no way we don't like the people you are selling to we are going to fight you? Horsham residents tried to fight the WaWa on Horsham Rd (the one closer to Maple). That was an old home that ended up bank owned. And if TD owns both property's and wants to sell them together who has the right to insist they sell them seperately? Would I want to live next to a WaWa no, but I didn't purchase a property adjacent to a commercial property either. The Old Mill may or may not be falling apart but it is deteriorating, it is in a flood zone, from what I understand flood insurance is high. Do the residents want to incur the cost to preserve it, insure it, etc... with an increase in their taxes? Or do you really believe Montgomery has $ to give as grants for that? Montgomery County is in debt and has had to cut grants in many area's where is the $ supposed to come from for all of this historical preservation?

Reply
Comment_arrow

EE

7:50 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

Montco is in debt so is the country.We should just write a letter to Obama he can just raise the debt ceiling agian.He has no problem with that.lol

Comment_arrow

Sid Frank

8:44 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

The Old MIll is not a registered historic building. Eve if it was, that really doesn't protect it from demolition. Anybody can put a property on the Historic registry, but it takes a while.
The old mill was built in a flood zone because it was intended to flood. That's how they got the big wheel to turn. It's been standing 300 years and will probably stand another 300. Again, it was built to withstand floods.
Tara, I am not sure, but I believe our council has the $ in their capital accounts to at least get the ball rolling on renovating the Old Mill and making it into a museum (on a second floor to avoid floods). I think if the residents wanted it, and if we could get additional grants, we could make something happen. It will take time and patience (which I know is difficult for people who love convenience), but in the long run, it could be a great boost for Hatboro to have a little museum in that place. It could be a visiting center for school groups and history buffs. If a small admission was charged and there was a thriving gift shop, the place might actually be able to sustain itself. Now, it's a dream, but why not dream??????!!!!!! I think it would be great!!

1904Boro

7:18 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

What was said at the concept presentation to counsel was that Wawa was planning to preserve and protect the Old Mill by addressing the flooding and storm water drainage issues with the properties which would help tremendously with the residents homes, and school upstream and business’s in that whole area. The cost to taxpayers would be $0 and as far as usage of the Old Mill after that they have not said, but maybe they would donate it to the borough for the historical Hatboro artifacts since it has no real value otherwise.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tara

7:41 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

If WaWa addressed and was able to stop some of the flooding and draining issues I would think the residents would LOVE that? But if they fix the water issues wouldn't the Old Mill property actually be worth something? I have seen multiple posts about this property being "Donated". Was that something WaWa said? Is this a common practice that a bank or large company would actually pay for a property and then donate it?

EE

7:44 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

You have to watch an be careful of what businesses come into a small community.If people want to live around low end stores there are some good properties off of 5Th Street an even Front Street in Philly.They used to be great shopping districts.Look at them areas now.Maybe even Kensington Ave or Frankford Ave.They all have one thing in common.Years ago they were family oriented areas and tight neighborhood shopping areas.Now they are shit holes.

Reply

Sid Frank

8:32 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

Nobody thinks Hatboro will ever be Doylestown. Nobody wants Hatboro to be Doylestown. Nobody wants upscale boutiques. But do want to see SOME of our history preserved. What people are forgetting is that this is not necessarily about the Old Mill, it's also about a THRIVING business (the Spa Escape) in an historic building that will definitely be torn down to make way for the Wawa. What if Wawa wants to save the Old Mill? Are people willing to demolish a successful business and an historic house (Spa Escape) to save the Old Mill? And to Al, our country was built by a few dreamers. It's ok to dream. Not to be Doylestown, but to be Hatboro. And to be Hatboro, we should save SOMETHING from our history.

Reply

1904boro

9:27 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

They may both have been built around the same time Cira 1724 according to history books available at the Union Library, but the building with the most historical significance is the Old Mill for it's contribution during the War is it Not? Why didn't the owner of Spa Escape buy the property from the previous owner when the properties where seperate and not tied together? I'd think a lease to own with the pervious owner prior to defualt would have been sufficant. Why hasn't the bank booted her if they don't care to talk to her as sum post have stated, cause once the bank took possesion isn't her lease invailed then? I just think if Wawa is willing as they have stated in open forum to council to preserve and protect the Old Mill and all that intails at no cost to the Borough it makes more sense than to stand on principle and force that area to suffer cause of insufficant funds to address ALL the problems not just buy a couple of buildings and drop (donate) them in the lap of the borough and the tax payers to deal.I think with the parking at the Old Mill even if it was preseved would not lend it's self to much more than a small office of some kind that is why I'd say a Hatboro Historical Museum would be nice and also make some of the HRA ideas (preserving Hatbor History) a reality.

Reply

BBH

9:52 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

Please remember to attend the Feb 28th meeting at Pennypack Elementary-especially those that are in favor of developing/updating our town. At this point, I will say that I do not want the HRA speaking for me. I think that it is a big mistake to not even consider what this development would do for the community. Please check out this site-Wawa COULD be a good neighbor-IF even considered.
http://www.wawa.com/wawaweb/community.aspx

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sid Frank

11:47 am on Friday, February 10, 2012

Please remember, the HRA will not speak for you. It will speak for residents who want some kind of historic preservation. They realize there are many opposing viewpoints and you are certainly entitled to yours. And also remember, Wawa is a great company to work for and they already are a great neighbor. At the corner of Moreland and York Roads. I'm happy to get my shorti hoagie there and my gas at the Sunoco.

Comment_arrow

EE

12:45 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012

I am sure Wawa is good for our commuinity.Why not redo the other one? Why would you kick out a thriving business just to put in a bigger business.If i am not mistaken i think the Spa Escape has 5 full time workers an 10 -15 part time.It is hard enough to run a good business theses days so why make it harder on the Spa.You are not gaining any tax money from what i understand.Actually i would think you are losing.The home behind the property has agreed to sell to Wawa the property taxes for that one home are roughly thirty five hundred.You then have the Billet House i heard the taxes for that property were eighteen thousand a year.If you tear down all three i think you would be loosing money in property taxes.These figures of course are estimates i don't know exactally what they pay.

BBH

9:37 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012

Sid you mean Monument and York-right?

Reply
Comment_arrow

J.R. sr

9:50 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012

you are both wrong...It is MONTGOMERY and York....

BBH

9:39 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012

For the amount of bullying that is going on here -how could someone dream of saying no to a HRA petition?????

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary Cummings

8:21 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012

Oh my goodness. Nice try BBH. I don't see any bullying. I actually see people from both sides brining up good points. What are you trying to stir up here? You can certainly say no to the HRA petition. Make your voice heard! What's important is the boro council and Wawa hear what the residents want. And if that's a Wawa then it's a wawa. But I'm afraid you might be in the minority! In the mean time, lets try not to get sucked into the cess pool of finger pointing and intimidation. These boards could be great discussions or they could be places where people vent their anger and nothing gets done. Where's the fun in that?

J.R. sr

9:51 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012

I am all for a Wawa too....just not there. I think the Wawa would be better suited at the North end of town, where that (seemingly)never open Exxon is located...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary Cummings

8:22 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012

I agree, JR. I am afraid that the Wawa in town will close too, leaving another abaondoned store in the center of Hatboro.........

Keyser Soze

7:33 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012

Yes, let us fight WaWa and they will just build somewhere just outside of Hatboro. Then, the WaWa located at York and MONTGOMERY (which WaWa rents), will close because it no longer fits into WaWa's current business plan. If we keep it up, soon we can have every store on York Road closed, then have the town all to ourselves.

Reply
Comment_arrow

J.R. sr

3:45 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012

Keyser, according to your post, Wawa will be closing the in-town location anyway, because it doesn't fit "their business plan". So why lose two buildings with historical significance to our town, when they would so obviously close the current location. The way you put it, the people of Hatboro should fight a new location, no matter where it is planned......

Comment_arrow

Keyser Soze

7:04 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012

J.R. sr- Umm, no, that is not what I'm saying in the least. In today's current climate, it is fiscally irresponsible to turn away a large business that is willing to invest in this town (along with its tax money) simply to save an old, moldy, crumbling building that George Washington once slept in. This town's store fronts are emptying at an alarming rate and are remaining vacant. In a different climate, I may have a different opinion.

So, what is your fix for this? History is nice, but not to the point of the town having tumbleweed blowing around.

Comment_arrow

little eileen

9:12 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Keyser, the climate WILL change one day. It's not forever and it isn't an excuse to tear down history. Geez people, this is why European towns are so much more beautiful that 99% of American towns. They preserve their history. We throw it away and forget it as soon as we possibly can.

Jason G

7:46 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012

I am really looking forward to the meeting in 2 weeks. Having just moved to town after buying a house I look forward to getting more into the direction Hatboro is taking.

I enjoyed many dinners at the Old Mill, and as a business owner myself I have no real idea as to what to do with the current property. It would be a nightmare doing anything with the building; first in the hoops that would you need to jump through getting it fixed up, and second living with the fear of it flooding again.

I personally am against a massive Wawa opening up right at the edge of town with one already in town. And to bulldoze two wonderful buildings down, especially with a thriving business already located in one only makes me more against it.

Reply

Anonymous76

8:32 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012

I think Hatboro could do something with those two buildings to draw in visitors. No one living outside the borough knows about the history of the grist mill. Not a museum, per se, but something that would highlight the history. Any possibility of moving the off-main Hatboro theater group (I forget their name) to the Spa building?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Keyser Soze

7:07 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012

Frances, are you suggesting that the Village Players squat at a building that is owned by TD Bank?

Dolores Forget

9:32 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012

Keyser or whoever you are when you are not hiding behind a screen name, you appear starstruck by "big business" moving into town. Wawa at the end of town won't have any impact (good or bad) on the empty holes in the center of town. Big business has the interest of the corporation at heart, not the town they are operating in. To believe otherwise is naive

Reply
Comment_arrow

Keyser Soze

8:24 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Humm, let me think, what could Wawa bring to town? I know, which is one of the arguments used by the "No Wawa" crowd: a bunch of vehicular traffic. What road do you think the vehicles will travel on to get to the Wawa? York Road. So, I disagree, more vehicular traffic in town brings more exposure of the businesses in the center of town.

Comment_arrow

little eileen

9:13 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Keyser...the Wawa rep herself said it was unlikely a new Wawa would significantly affect traffic patterns. They expect most customers to be people who would be passing by anyway.

Leave a comment