patching...
Update: Want to get your Hatboro and Horsham news in your inbox every morning? Sign up for our free newsletter! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Hatboro Official: Tax Increase Necessary

Council President John Zygmont said a $52 local services tax, levied against Hatboro workers, could lessen the impact of a tax hike.

 

If last year’s budget process was any indication, Hatboro will once again be considering a budget with a tax boost, according to Council President John Zygmont.

Just how much is yet to be determined.

“We’re going to be seeing some type of a tax increase this year,” Zygmont said during Monday night’s council meeting. “It’s reality.”

To help minimize that reality, Zygmont suggested the borough introduce an ordinance to create a $52 Local Services Tax. The council took no action Monday, but Zygmont said the governing body would need to make a decision at its Oct. 22 meeting so it could be put in place for January, when the tax would begin to be deducted. The tax would be deducted throughout the course of the year at $1 per week. 

The tax, if enacted, would be levied against the estimated 2,150 who work in Hatboro and earn more than $12,000 per year. It would replace the $10 per year Occupational Privilege Tax.

“I would ask council to think about this as a way of getting $93,000 from outside the borough as opposed to increasing real estate taxes,” Zygmont said, referring to the estimated amount that would be paid by non-residents.

Based on 2012 first quarter figures provided by Berkheimer Tax Administrator, the higher wage tax would generate $111,782 in total. Of that amount, $18,785 would be paid by the 361 borough residents who earn more than $12,000 per year for work in Hatboro. Workers who live outside of Hatboro would pay the remaining $92,997.

In Montgomery County, 40 of 60 municipalities – including Horsham – have enacted a $52-per-year Local Services Tax. In Bucks County, 33 of 57 communities have put the $52 tax in place.

Related Topics: Hatboro Borough Council, Hatboro government, Hatboro taxes, Local Services Tax, and Wage tax

Mike Staples

6:47 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

"...the estimated 2,150 borough employees..." Is this a typo?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Theresa Katalinas

6:51 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Mike,
No, it's not a typo. There are approximately 2,150 people who work in Hatboro.

John Shepherd

9:23 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

The statement, as it appears, is open to misunderstanding. I think you meant to say that the tax would be levied on the 2,150 people who work in the borough. Mike, I believe, read it to mean that the tax would be levied on 2,150 people who work for the borough. That, if true, would be quite disturbing.

Reply

Robert Applegarth

8:32 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

I guess my comment was censored because of its comment? Maybe Patch can explain that to me? Did it appear somewhere else, I don't know?

Reply

Robert Applegarth

8:33 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Make that ...because of its content. Sorry.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Theresa Katalinas

9:11 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Hi Robert,
I'm not sure what you mean. I see two comments you made on this article. Are you saying there were other comments made that are not showing?

kenny Johmson

5:10 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

They need to get a new editor, One that communicates properly. Definitely has a communication problem.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robert Applegarth

9:07 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

To Kenny Johmson(different spelling?) and Theresa Katalinas; Yes, I did make more comments. There is definitely some sort of problem.

Patch_comments_icon

Theresa Katalinas

9:10 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Hi Robert,
I've seen your comments related to this topic on other articles. (There have been several articles now on the possibility of a $52 per year local services tax). I have not deleted any of your comments.

Reply

Leave a comment