patching...
Update: Want to get your Hatboro and Horsham news in your inbox every morning? Sign up for our free newsletter! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Hatboro Landlord Wants to Build in Flood Zone

The owner of 332 S. York Road in Hatboro is seeking approval to build 16 two-story residences where several car repair shops are currently located.

 

An oft-flooded South York Road property could be home to 16 two-story townhouses or apartments if Hatboro’s zoning hearing board grants permission to build in a floodplain.

Horizon Property Management LLC, which owns the 332 S. York Road structures housing a handful of car repair shops and Manja pizza shop, is proposing to knock down all but the restaurant on the 1.76-acre parcel to make way for 16 residential units.

“The applicant/appellant proposes to renovate the existing building to retain the existing restaurant and to replace all other uses with 16 two-story townhouses or garden apartments normally found in the R-4 residential district,” Jim Case of Horizon Property Management wrote in his application, which was supposed to be considered during the Jan. 9 zoning hearing board meeting. The applicant, however, has requested that the matter be postponed.

If approved as proposed, Case wrote that the development would have the “same general character as mid-rise apartments.”

Tom Dessalet, the owner of 0 to 60 Tranz Tech, which has been located at 332 S. York Road for seven years, said Horizon Property Management representatives had not shared plans with him.

“I got a notice stuck in my door,” he said. “I’m hoping that they want to get me out of here.”

Dessalet, who endured two floods and lost four vehicles and about $50,000 in stock as a result of Hurricane Irene in 2011, said he had been interested in relocating his business, but was locked in with his lease.

Flooding destroyed the former home of Quig’s Pizza – now Manja – requiring the structure to be gutted and completely renovated.

The property’s close proximity to Pennypack Creek and its predisposition for flooding is what prompted Horizon to seek another use for the site, according to Case’s application.

“The subject property is unique having two buildings within the floodplain conservation district which has flooded several times over the prior eight years and which are no longer suitable or appropriate for the existing automotive type uses or other permitted uses located on the ground floor of the buildings,” the application states.

The proposed redevelopment results in an impervious surface coverage being reduced from 98 percent to 40.7 percent through the development of “green areas” and the “redesign of the parking areas,” according to the application.

“The requested relief is the minimum relief necessary to make a reasonable use of the subject property and to overcome the flooding issues caused by its location,” Case wrote in the application.

As proposed, the living areas would be “at a minimum of not less than one foot above the 100-year recurrent interval flood.” In addition, the stucco and brick residences would “require floodproofing measures” as designated by a professional engineer or architect.

Last year, citing extensive flood damage from Hurricane Irene, Horizon Property Management had applied for a $2.2 million government buyout of the properties at 332 S. York Road, meaning that, if the buyout had been approved, structures would have been demolished and future buildings of any kind would be prohibited. Hatboro officials received word in July that PEMA would not grant the buyout for the property.

When reached for comment as to why his company would first seek to demolish the properties and then look to build residences, George Kiriakidi, an owner of Horizon Property Management LLC, said he would “rather not say anything.”

The Hatboro Zoning Hearing Board was slated to hear the Horizon Property Management application on Jan. 9 during its 7 p.m. meeting, but the applicant postponed the hearing. A date has not yet been set. 

  • Should Hatboro allow the owners of 332 S. York Road to build in a floodplain?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes, if it means making the property more aesthetically pleasing.
        6 (22%)
    • No, it's already proven to be a flood-prone site.
        21 (77%)
    Total votes: 27
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: 16 two-story residences, 332 South York Road Hatboro, Hatboro, Horizon Property Management LLC, Pennypack Creek, South York Road, floodplain, and manja

HarleyGirl04

8:30 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

It's becoming more Urban like already....Let's not add to this problem, and as far as the flooding, who would want to insure these properties ?

Reply

JHat

9:10 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Maybe you can build the Wawa here!

Reply

Terri

9:29 am on Monday, January 7, 2013

Why does Hatboro need yet another apartment building? Stop the madness already! I think am going to move into Philadelphia. At this point there is more open space there than this town!

Reply

Tori

1:28 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

How stupid is this idea?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

4:36 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

If it fails the government and Hatboro and banks will hold the bag.

JCC

2:59 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

In Huntingdon Valley they had apartments in a flood zone and knocked down the old to put in a building that fixed the flooding problem and obviously elevated the site. They are luxury homes and absolutely an improvement from the eye sore that was once there. It isn't a bad idea as long as it is done right! Improvements are always good for an area!

Reply

Tori

3:36 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

If they are going to go through with this, which I am sure they will, I wish they would opt for the townhomes as opposed to apartments. Hatboro needs homeowners not renters. We have enough ot them already.

Reply

Bob

4:35 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013

A cofferdam like in Huntingdon Valley is an excellent idea. However "The best laid plans of mice and men, oft go astray" leaving FEMA and PEMA and SBA grants to bail them out.

Reply

Jennifer Diffley

3:47 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Why did they let Manja spend all of the money to build if this was an idea in the works? I think townhomes are fine, if they build them knowing that they will flood...and have nothing on the first floor but parking...kind of like at the beach. I also agree that homeowners would be nice as opposed to renters.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Theresa Katalinas

8:09 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Jen,
If this plan goes through, Manja would remain. The auto repair shops would go.

James Sheridan

10:09 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

I think it would be good. The builder will make alot of those parking lots into green space and I am sure the will make the green space elevated to stop water from rising as high. And I am sure the town houses will not be like all the other apartments in hatboro. They will look much nicer and in my opinion add to the town. Its a good chance for a fresh start to fix the flooding.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JCC

9:24 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I agree 100%. Improvements are always good!

JHat

10:19 pm on Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Building along the creek in Hatboro is just a crazy idea given all of the flooding we have endured, particularly over the last five years. The problem keeps getting worse thanks to all the new construction, not better. Sure, nice new elevated townhouses or apartments might look fantastic (just like the mostly vacant monstrosities most recently built in Hatboro), but there is nothing this builder is going to do to keep the water from rising.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JCC

9:27 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I am going to think positive if this happens and hope for the best. I am thinking they are using some kind of cutting edge technology to work around the problem and make it more eco friendly and preventing future damage to new buildings.

Leave a comment